The God Chord! Just Intonation–Overtones, Octaves

On some previous blogs i’ve written on, I had a series of articles that I called “The God Chord” where I talked about tuning, the overtone series, and all the magical connections between numbers, math, frequencies, geometry and music.  I think that the simplicity and beauty of the numbers behind music have been obscured behind arcane music theory systems that confuse the intuitiveness of the origin of the fundamental materials of sound and music.

I’ve talked to a lot of people and musicians who are intimidated by music theory.  I think there is a reason for this–western music theory doesn’t make any sense!  I consider all the words and ideas in old-school music theory to be the product of a centuries long cultural evolution that never gave a second thought to being clear or logical. 

fourier_harmonics     

Sine waves (odd number harmonics) combing to create a square-wave shaped waveform.

Anyway, enough ranting.  Let’s get down to the numbers.  After familiarizing yourself with how musical frequencies are related, thinking about music from a mathematical standpoint is a lot more intuitive and direct.  There are two basic materials that everything in music is based on:  octaves, and the overtone series.

Musical notes are described numerically as frequencies, or in “cycles per second,” denoted by the term “hertz” or “hz.”  The wonderful thing about frequencies is that they are also used to describe the electromagnetic spectrum, including visible light, radio, micro, gamma, and x-rays, or, if you want, the rotation and orbits of planets, anything that repeats periodically.  The incredible thing about all of this, is that musical frequencies can be related to all kinds of phenomena–the light emitted by the sun, the resonances in minerals and atoms, with simple ratios.  This begins to explain why I’ve titled this series “the god chord.”  Because, I think, if God really exists somewhere, I think God is a frequency.  Or a melody. Or, most likely, a CHORD.

 If you need to catch up on your frequency theory, check WIKIPEDIA

So, as I mentioned before, I wanted to describe octaves, and overtones.  Let’s start with frequencies, and octaves.  

Musical frequencies are Logarithmic.  For instance, if we are in the key of A (440 hertz), the next octave up would be at 880 hz, and below, 220 hz, and so on.  All of these frequencies, that are powers of 2 of the original frequency, are considered the same note, but just at different locations.  This phenomenon is highly useful and fundamental to nearly all music in all cultures.  If you were to describe this in ratios, with 440 hz being 1/1, then 880hz would be 2/1, 1760hz (the next octave up) would be 4/1, and so on.  220 hz would be 1/2, 110hz would be 1/4, etc.    incidentally, 2/1 and 4/1 are both Overtones.  Any frequency you can imagine has duplicates of itself in octaves going toward infinity both above and below, beyond the range of human hearing, and the scale of human perception.

OK.  Now, let’s talk about the overtone series.  The overtone series is also described by mathematicians as the Harmonic Series.  Like the octaves I was just describing, the overtone series is infinite, only limited by the range of human hearing and the physical properties of whatever object is projecting the frequencies.  When analyzing a musical tone, you can clearly see the overtone series in its frequency components:

Harmonic partials in a piano tone.     

Harmonic partials in a piano tone.

Let’s start with a frequency of 440 hertz.  

The overtone series is simply the original frequency, multiplied by every integer, starting with the number one.  so, 

440*1 = 440

440*2 = 880

440*3 = 1320

440*4 = 1760

440*5 = 2200

and so on, until infinity.  

In musical notation, the overtone series looks approximately like this, though most notes in the overtone series can’t be accurately represented in this kind of notation:

approximate representation of the overtone series on a musical staff     

approximate representation of the overtone series on a musical staff

This very simple mathematical series is the root of all musical scales and harmonies.  

It sounds like this:

Harmonic Series Demo

It might sound vaguely familiar to you.  If you’ve ever played the harmonics up and down a guitar string, those are the same frequencies. Periodic (repeating) musical tones are all built from these frequencies. In fact, here is a simple recording of me playing the harmonics up a guitar string, until the 8th harmonic in the harmonic series. 

Guitar Harmonic Series Demo

You can count along with the notes, and each number will be the corresponding harmonic:  Just count:  

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.  

The first harmonic is the “fundamental” and that is just the sound of me playing an open string.  If you listen close, you can hear certain intervals.  For instance, the 3rd harmonic is a perfect fifth, the 5th harmonic is a major third (doesnt’ make sense, right?).  I personally love the sound of the seventh harmonic, which is a lot like a “minor seventh,” but is actually about 30% of a semitone flat from the interval you would play on a piano.

As opposed to an octave, this series is an Arithmetic Progression, not a logarithmic one.  the octaves of the fundamental frequency, are the fundamental multiplied by 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64…. So, you can see that, between each octave further up the overtone series, the overtones become more closely spaced.  At some point, the frequencies become so close together that it is difficult to for the human ear to distinguish them.

Allright.  I hope you’re still with me!  After these fundamentals, comes the interesting stuff.  Now, we can combine the concept of the octave and harmonics to make all kinds of scales and harmonies.  The trick is to take the frequencies in the overtone series and move them downwards (or upwards) with octave displacement to make the tones fit into a normal musical scale.  For instance:

As described above, the fifth overtone of A 440 is 2200 hz.  2200 divided by 4 (this moves the note down two octaves)  is 550 hertz.  That is the exact frequency of a harmonically pure major third (the note C# in the key of A).  On a well-tuned piano, the note would be about 554 hertz.  A small but noticeable difference.  And when you put more of these notes together in harmonies, you can really hear the beauty of the tones interlocking with their pure mathematical relationships!

Here is a demo I made just to show some very simple, overtone-based harmonies.  Hopefully you can hear the quality of the overtone series, that I showed in the previous audio examples here, but applied in a looser context.  Just a very simple improvisation, but I can’t get enough of those pure harmonies.

Overtone Chords Demo

Hope you made it all the way through, and I hope I grabbed your interest!  Check back, I will be writing more about this subject, with more illustrations and audio examples.

VOSIM Synthesis for the Masses

I’m always on the lookout for interesting new ways to get sounds, or new synthesis methods.  Especially ones that don’t take a degree an DSP engineering to figure out.  VOSIM fits the bill.  VOSIM is a kind of formant synthesis where you can control the formant (louder peaks in the frequency spectrum, like in vocals) and fundamental frequency of a tone completely independently, without using any subtractive filters.  

Some VOSIM waveforms

Some VOSIM waveforms

Above are some VOSIM waveforms.  It’s hard to glean exactly what VOSIM is from the Csound patches and weird academic descriptions online, so I am just giving my approximate definitions and explanations here (please correct me if I’m wrong here, inter-nerds).  Basically, VOSIM is a chain of Parabol (or sine) pulses that are “windowed” or enveloped into bursts.  There can be a delay between these bursts, or they can immediately follow one another.  I found that the delay between bursts did not affect the sound as much as the frequency of the pulse trains, and it was tricky to implement (I did have a working version of a delayed-burst version of VOSIM working to get the waveforms in the image above) so I just made a version with continuous bursts (where one follows immediately after the preceding burst).

Breaking it down...

Breaking it down...

The diagram above explains the Signal flow of my patch.  A sine wave is multiplied by itself to give sine^2.  This makes the waveform completely positive instead of bipolar.  A sawtooth wave that has only positive values is multiplied with the Sin^2 pulses to give continuous Bursts of pulses.  The length of these bursts, determined by the frequency of the sawtooth wave, gives the fundamental frequency of the tone, and the frequency of the sine^2 pulses gives the formant frequency.

sawtooth wave (orange) provides the envelope for the pulses (yellow)

sawtooth wave (orange) provides the envelope for the pulses (yellow)

There is one other trick to getting this all working–the sine^2 pulses must be phase-synced with the sawtooth wave so there are no ugly clicking sounds.  Any synthesis system with oscillators that can be synced should do this just fine.  Make sure that the sawtooth wave is ramping downwards, not upwards, as is often the case in synthesizers.

This is a very interesting synthesis method that can be implemented in just about any digital modular system!  I think more people should give it a try.  And I think there should be more dialogue online about doing cool stuff like this instead of gazillions of rehashings of classic analogue sounds and “how did so and so get this sound in such and such track.”  So, anyone else have some cool ideas?

Here is a video I made to illustrate what the VOSIM waveform looks like, and some of the sounds that can be achieved with a simple VOSIM patch:

Here is my nord G2 modular VOSIM patch:

Golden VOSIM G2 patch

I got my idea for this stuff from the fantastic “Advanced programming Techniques for Modular Synthesizers” website.

Here’s a quick track I made with the VOSIM sounds (needed my 2nd beer for this one):

Voxhinda Mp3 Audio

Modular Sequencing: Structures and Sounds

Over the past year I have been using and loving five12’s modular sequencing application, Numerology.  Numerology introduced me to the idea of modular sequencing.  I even posted a full review of the program here:

 

Numerology Review

 

These days, modular synthesis seems damned popular.  There’s an incredible amount of analog synthesis modules available from different companies and everyone and their mother (every rich guy and his mother, at least) seems like they have acquired or are on the road to getting a modular synth.  Well, that’s great, and sure, i’d get one if I could afford it.  To me, though, modular *sequencing* is a lot more interesting than modular *synthesis* right now.

 

 

Modular Sequencing in the nord g2

Modular Sequencing in the nord g2

 With modular synthesis, you design signal paths to create sounds.  But with modular sequencing, you can design sequencer networks to create musical structures!  If you have interesting control data, you can create better sounds.  And if you have interesting structures, you can make sounds  more interesting by creating a compelling musical context for them to exist in.  With a good sequencer, you can send complex control data to even the most boring synth module to make it come alive.

 

There are a few options i know of for doing this kind of sequencing.  Numerology is one of my favorites, but there are other platforms too.  I have been doing a lot of sequencing on my g2 modular, which has excellent sequencing modules that are fast and intuitive to use.  This track, for instance, was completely sequenced from my G2:

 

Archytas’ Alaap Mp3 audio

 

And in case you were interested, this track actually features one of those greek scales I was discussing in my previous blog.  It’s Archytas’ Enharmonic Scale.

 

The g2 costs over $1000, though.  And it’s discontinued.  And Five12’s Numerology only runs on OSX!  What’s a PC user without a g2 system to do?  Well, I’ve been so intrigued by the possibilities that this type of sequencing offers, that I decided to make my own modular sequencing system in Reaktor that is inspired by my experiences with the g2 and Numerology.  So hopefully, i’ll be creating another option for interested parties.  The thing about modular sequencing is that the whole is much more than the sum of its parts.  You can use a few very simple sequencing modules, if you find a clever way to control them, to create very nice evolving sequences.

 

 

snapshot of the beta version of my reaktor sequencer

snapshot of the beta version of my reaktor sequencer

This sequencing system is very much in Beta.  Actually, I just started on it this week.  But hopefully there is going to be more modules soon.  And as soon as I have something more comprehensive going on, I might write up some simple documentation.  So, for now, this ensemble is not for the reaktor n00bs out there.  But feel free to give it a go!  Just have it send midi to somewhere.  Look inside the structure and see where the control data is coming from.  have fun!

 

Here is a very simple demo track I made with this sequencer.  I am only using the “gate seq” and the “control seq” to send a monophonic sequence to my tx81z.  Just an experiment, but I think there is a lot of potential!

 

Reaktor Sequencing Demo

 

Here’s another demo, also, just straight midi being sent to my tx81z:

Reaktor Sequencing Demo 2

 

 And finally, here is the reaktor ensemble:

 

Reaktor Modular Sequencing ensemble (beta)

 

Ancient Greek Scales!

Earlier I posted here about using pythagorean tuning in my music.  Many other Greek philosophers had ideas about tuning instruments, however.  A book I have, “Tuning and Temperament, a Historical Survey” by  J. Murray Barbour, had a good list of Greek tunings in it.  I didn’t find the book very interesting, because it focuses more on Temperaments than Just Intonation, and the author, like many others, approaches the subject with the idea that modern Equal Temperament is the pinnacle of all musical systems.  But, hey, there are some good scales in there!  I’ll share them here, to save you all some time :).

I have also been using Scala, a scale editor and librarian application, which has a ridiculously comprehensive listing of different scales, which I believe also encompasses the scales that I’ve put into this reaktor macro.  The problem with Scala, i’ve found, is that there are just too many damn scales, and variations on scales, to even know where to begin.  This doesn’t work for me. I am just taking things one step at a time, and finding little areas within microtonal and just intonation, and exploring them individually.

 

Thanks for the scales ptolemy!  We're one step closer to the music of the spheres.

Thanks for the scales ptolemy! We're one step closer to the music of the spheres.

I took a micro tuning macro that I snagged from the Reaktor User Library a while back, and put these scales into it.  I dont’ remember who made this macro, so if anyone knows, please speak up, and i’ll give the original author credit!  Anyhow, the scales I found were from Ptolemy (more famous as an astronomer), Erastothenes, Archytas, and Didymus.  

Greeks made scales out of groups of tetrachords, which are just basically small scales spanning the interval of a perfect fourth.  These Greek scales all have a similar flavor, because they are built in the same way: two tetrachords, separated by a major second (the ratio of 9/8) in the center.  Because of this, every scale here has the intervals of the perfect fourth and a perfect fifth.  Also, these scales are all somewhat “phrygian” in character because they generally all start with a small step much like a half step, and finish with one of the many variations on a  minor seventh that is found in just intonation.  I really love how these scales are all unified by a similar method of construction, but all have their own different characters!  That is what I was talking about earlier: finding an area, and exploring it.  Systems like this are very interesting to work with.

I have set these scales up (since they are all made of 7 notes) to play on all the white keys of the keyboard.  But if you play through the different modes of these scales, you can get even more different flavors! 

Here is the Reaktor macro:

Greek Scales Reaktor Macro

Sun Ra’s Ihnfinity, Inc. Charter

Sun Ra incorporated his organization into an entity called “Ihnfinity, Inc.”  He actually incorporated it twice, the second time after the expiration of the first corporation.  I read the Charter of this corporation in the book, “Space is the Place” by John F. Szwed and thought it was too good not to share.

sunra1

The first Charter:

To perform works of an humanitarian nature among all people of earth, to help stamp out (destroy) ignorance destroying its own major purpose, to changing ignorance to constructive live creativity, to own and operate all kinds of research laboratories, studios, electronic equipment, electro-chemical communicational devices of our own design and creativity,  and electromechanical equipment, electronic equipment relating to audio and video devices and audio and video devices themselves including sound recordings and tapes as well as video recordings, tapes, teleportation, astral projection devices, mind cleansing sound devices, magnetic computers, electrical and electronic devices related to all phases of enterplanatary space travel including magnetic energy producing ships with speeds greater than the speed of light (as presently known), including enterplanetary cosmonetic devices of an astro infinity nature, to own real estate including land, buildings, factories, water, including air space above same, to use these values for the greater advancement of all people of earth and creative live beings of this galaxy and other galaxies beyond the sun.

sunra2

 

The Second Charter:

To perform spiritual-cosmic-intergalactic-infinity research works relative to worlds-dimensions-planes in galaxies and universes beyond the present now known used imagination of mankind, beyond the intergalactic central sun and works relative to spiritual and spiritual advancement of our presently known world.  To awaken the spiritual conscious of mankind putting him back in contact with his “Creator.”  To make mankind aware that there are superior beings (Gods) on other planets in other galaxies.  To make mankind aware that the “Creator” (God) is here now and that he is also present in other world-galaxies.  To help stamp out (destroy) ignorance destroying its major purpose changing ignorance to constructive creative progress.  To use these spiritual-cosmic values for the greater advancement of all people of earth and creative live beings of this galaxy and galaxies beyond the intergalactic central sun.  To establish spiritual energy refilling houses (churches) where people can come to refill themselves with spiritual energy and to seek their “natural Creator” (God).  To perform works as the “Creator” (God) wills us, “Ihnfinity,” to perform.

 

Anyway, I agree wholeheartedly with these mission statements, and now officially adopt them as the Golden Master Charters™

ramblings… Live Mixing

Most of the audio I make is based on improvisation in some way, usually messing with effects and patterns and mix levels until I get something that sounds right.  For a long time, I thought that any musical process or tools that weren’t good for live performance were useless or boring.  I’ve gotten over that to a degree, and I have a studio now for the most part stays at home.  Before, I didn’t want anything that I couldn’t throw in a bag and play a set with, or take to my friend’s place and record some improvisations.  But my initial approach has stayed with me over the years, and I rarely ever find myself recording a multitrack mix and editing it in a DAW.  

mixer1

my soundcraft mixer

Sometimes I feel lazy because I rarely go through that “finishing” process, with all the separate tracks, tweaking the EQ’s, mix levels, compression, editing the flow of the track, cross-fading things, adding extra samples, all that.

 Frankly though, working full time and approaching composition that way just aren’t compatible for me because of the amount of time involved.  An average day for me is working, coming home, setting something up, and recording some different kind of jam.  I cant’ really record multiple tracks into a DAW, edit them, tweak them, add new ones, layer, and all that.  I just don’t have the time in a day.

I’ve changed my mind on all this recently, though.  I realized that the spontaneous improvisations I record usually have much more feeling and life to them, and evolve more organically, than the comparable tracks that I have done all that extensive editing work on.  Sure, the improvised tracks sound rough around the edges.  But I think in music, roughness is related to expression.  Music that is produced too carefully usually sounds that way.

 

proper attire for achieving a clean sounding mix

proper attire for achieving a clean sounding mix

 

And doing all that editing work, isn’t very fun.  That stuff feels more like picking your nose than making music.  And hearing the same chunk of audio over and over so many times, repeated with absolute precision, thanks to modern digital recording, is the easiest way to lose perspective on a piece of music, and the easiest way to kill it.  I think music needs to be more rough around the edges these days!  Too much music sounds like it was put together in a cleanroom instead of played by a musician.  Maybe that’s related to why synth nerds like to wear white gloves.

Live music: signal flow, performance, Geiger Counters

 

Watch out for Rads

Watch out for Rads

 

I have been preparing for a show I’m playing next month here in seattle.  When I am getting ready for a live set, that usually means that I am putting a patch in Audiomulch or Reaktor.  This time, I am putting something together in audiomulch 2.0.  

I’ve played a handful of shows at various venues, though not too many.  But almost all of my tracks are based on live improvisations in my home studio, so I do a lot of thinking about how to play improvised electronic music.  Over time, i’ve developed a way to route all of my audio so that I can take a fairly basic audio signal, and without too much effort, run it through a small group of effects in almost any way, using the same set of effects to make endless different sounds.  

 

snapshot of the signal flow section of my audiomulch patch

snapshot of the signal flow section of my audiomulch patch

The “8×8Matrix” you see in the center of the above picture is the heart of almost all of my live processing stuff that I do.  Being able to take any input and dynamically route it to any output is an amazing thing.  And taking those outputs, putting them back into the inputs, and re-effecting them, is even better.  With this sort of setup, and a decent midi controller to manipulate the matrix from, you can take just a few effects and make entire universes out of them.  

I find this is one of the ideal ways to manipulate feedback, especially if there are time based effects in your group of effects processing units, like delays, reverb, or especially delayed granulation.  While many people focus on using granular processing for manipulating things on the “micro” timescale, I think it is one of the best ways to make interesting textures with respect to larger musical structures.  more on this later, maybe.

This live set I am working on is going to be focused on looping electric guitar with effects and some percussion in the background.  I’ve set up my midi footpedal to control audiomulch’s Live Looper contraption, and will be using a novation launchpad to control the mixing matrix, the playback of the recorded loops, and other things.

Anyhow, I did an improvisation tonight with audiomulch, and a drum synth plugin I enjoy using, “microtonic.”  I used some of the methods I just described above to process the drums.  I’ll post more updates and improvisations as I work on this business.

MP3 audio of “Broken Counter”

The God Chord: Reaching back in Time

An interesting aspect of using special tunings is that it gives you a way to reach back in time and use some of the exact same tunings as older musicians, even ones from almost 3000 years ago!  The greeks wrote down their tuning systems, and they have been translated in numerous publications.  The greeks used a multitude of different scales, all of which would be called microtonal by modern standards.  Harry partch, mentioned in a previous blog, was also interested in these ancient tunings.  Here, for example, is a recording he made with one of his instruments in an ancient greek scale (which is actually explained in one of the following linked websites).

 

Listen to Partch playing an ancient Greek Scale

 

Most famous of these greek tuning magicians is Pythagoras, who is known for his mystical leanings and mathematical discoveries as well as his eponymous tuning system.  The story of pythagoras and his vegetarian followers is a different, but very interesting chapter from what I’m pursuing here–but that sort of thing only adds another layer of interest to an already interesting subject!  

 

pythagoras-1

the dude

 

 

Today I tuned my synthesizers to the ancient scale of pythagoras and pretended I was a polyrhythmically multithreaded robot strumming a lyre at the foot of mount olympus.  Zeus will probably zap me any minute now.

 

 

zeus zapping

zeus zapping

One of the best sites I’ve found with information on tuning and Just Intonation also has a lengthy section on the math and ideas behind ancient Greek Scales.  Make sure your thinking caps are on, because it’s quite technical: 

Music and Mathematics

 

And for you music theory heads, here is a website that goes into many of the details of Pythagorean tuning:

 

More details on Pythagorean tuning

 

Pythagoras’s tuning is the most mathematically simple way to derive a normal major, or diatonic, scale, and requires no ingredients other than the numbers 1, 2, and 3.  Our normal system of tuning is loosely based around a “5-limit” tuning system, which means that the ratios our frequencies are related by use no numbers greater than 5.  Pythagoras’s tuning, by logical extension, would be called “3 limit.”  It may sound conceptually elegant, but in the numbers, it isn’t.  For instance, in a C major scale, the ratio defining the relationship between C and E (a major third) is 5/4.  Because there are no fives allowed in 3-lmit tuning, pythagoras instead stacked 3’s on top of each other until he could get a similar note, defined by the ratio 81/64, which is quite out of tune.

 

That is just one example of the result of blindly sticking to an appealing idea, regardless of the consequences.  Our modern equal temperament tuning system also comes to mind.  Different tunings, have different flavors, however, and I decided to get old school today.  There are quite a few different ancient tunings available, all of which I’m excited to experiment with and try!

 

Here is the track I made in pythagorean tuning:

 

Link to track “Dune Beetle”

 

tech notes:  This track was made with five12 Numerology sequencing my tx81z and a reaktor ensemble I made, all running through various distortion pedals and outboard reverbs and delays.  The main track is in 5/4, but there is some 4/4 and 7/4 layered over the top of it, rhythmically phasing with it.  It was recorded live so there are some little moments of feedback as well.

 

 The pythagorean tuning I used in this particular track doesn’t come across as strong as the other microtunings that i’ve used, because the pythagorean system is somewhat similar in sound to equal temperament, and also because of all the crazy effects and layering that I used :).

Music DIY: Instant Baggerhorns

Yes, what you see below is the mother of all reed instruments.  Maybe that’s an exaggeration.  But it does hold a special place in my heart.  A good way to get outside of your normal way of thinking about sounds and music is to play an instrument or use tools you’re absolutely unfamiliar with.  Now, this may sound like horrible advice.  Maybe it even is.  I think it’s important, however, to make new neuronal pathways in your brain.  The best way to do this is to try something new.  And I think this applies to a lot more than just music.

 

Golden Master tooting his own horn

Golden Master tooting his own horn

 

This baggerhorn was supreme feat of engineering that took years of dedication and focus to bring to fruition.  Sorry, I’m in a hyperbolic mood.  Anyway, constructing one is easy.

 

The materials:  

 

1. Saxophone mouthpiece and reed.  

2. PVC pipe.  

3. Duct tape.

 

I am lucky enough to have a brother-in-law who plays saxophone professionally that has been willing to donate parts to my crazy-music cause.  In fact, he has donated his talents as well.  Last year, my friends from Makunouchi Bento (a great romanian electronic music duo) and I collaborated online to make an acoustic free-noise EP called “like a monkey without a cuckoo clock” that was released on Digital Biotope.  you can hear it here:

 

The baggerhorns (I actually made two of them), Patrick’s saxophone, and The Bento guys’ recordings of other acoustic sounds (banging on an unplugged electric organ, for instance) can all be heard on this EP.  Check it out!

 

Jebel Chamber Orchestra EP

 

Anyhow, assembling a baggerhorn is a simple affair.  Find a round object.  tape/glue/clamp a reeded mouthpiece to it.  poke holes to taste.  Lower notes need bigger holes, and don’t use a tube that is too narrow.  That’s it!   This is a very simple project that anyone could figure out on their own, but I’d love to hear about other fun easy projects people have tried, or made recordings of, like this.  I was able to get some pretty good sounds! 

God Chord: Gimme Seven

I’ll explain this God Chord business later.  I spent most of today doing some research on different harmonic ratios for tuning, and thinking about constructing scales out of them.

sevenFingers

What's wrong with this picture?

 

I made a couple little ratio etudes with a scale that I sort of “found,” where I focused on ratios with sevens and multiples of sevens in them.

Here’s a picture of the reaktor macro where I set the ratios–and you can see the ratios I was using:

sevenScale

Rice Scales... sounds like something a ricemutt would be into.

Anyhow, here are a couple audio files of the scale etudes I was working on.  This scale didn’t sound half bad!

Seven Scale: Phased looping melodies MP3 Audio

Seven Scale: Chord Loop MP3 Audio

And, as I’ve mentioned earlier, I’ll have more blogs explaining all this nonsense in the future!  Let me know if you have any questions, i’ll be glad to answer.